Your PR Review Is Not an Architecture Review
PR review is a code quality tool. Treating it as architecture enforcement isn't a discipline problem — it's a mismatch between what the tool can see and what enforcement actually requires.
Read postWriting
Things I'm building, breaking, and figuring out. Mostly backend and systems, with some detours into AI and the organizational side of engineering.
PR review is a code quality tool. Treating it as architecture enforcement isn't a discipline problem — it's a mismatch between what the tool can see and what enforcement actually requires.
Read postYou can write a perfect ADR and in 18 months nobody follows it. The question is not how to document better. It is what you do with the documentation after it is written.
Read postGitClear's data shows code cloning is up while refactoring is down. That matters because duplicated code creates coupling, and refactoring is the work that forces teams to reconcile it.
Read postI ran three experiments with Claude Code (Opus 4.6) and Codex (GPT-5.4 xhigh) — greenfield creation, extension, and brownfield detection. The conclusion: implicit coupling is a maintenance problem, not a generation problem.
Read post